![]() ![]() In 1994, Joe Guthridge was one of seven awarded the Windows Pioneer Award for feedback which the Amí development team gave to Microsoft during the early development of Windows. The Windows versions of Ami Pro were also bundled with Adobe Type Manager for Windows, as Windows had poor support for scalable fonts before the introduction of TrueType. Version 3.1 is the last version of Ami Pro released (all versions were 16 bit). Categories in common with Nisus Writer Pro: Document Creation. Lotus continued to develop Ami Pro further with version 3 released in 1992. Intuitive and easy to use, Foxit PDF Editor is a powerful, fast, secure, and affordable PDF editor for anyone who needs to convert, create, collaborate, or edit PDF files. Lotus obtained Ami Pro to round out their office suite by acquiring Samna in 1990. (The Windows version of Microsoft Word did not debut until early 1989.) Shortly after the release of Amí, the development team added support for tables and renamed the product Ami Pro. The predecessor to Ami Pro, Amí, was released in 1988, and was the first fully functional Windows word processor. Word Pro was based upon Ami Pro (originally published by Samna), but was substantially rewritten (including a new native document format). Word Pro can be obtained as part of the Lotus SmartSuite office suite. Lotus Word Pro is a word processor produced by IBM's Lotus Software group for use on Microsoft Windows-compatible computers and on IBM OS/2 Warp. html Archived August 19, 2007, at the Wayback Machine It’s now three months since you wrote your last status message./software /lotus /products /smartsuite /wordpro. A more precise date by which to expect release of even a beta version of a OpenOffice (or Nisus, or Mellel, or…) driver would be a good start. I think that’s a bad choice for both of us, and I think it belies a great deal of the spirit and much of the explicit language you use to tout the power and utility of EndNote. ![]() I know you cannot create a separate price structure depending on how much of the product a user can exploit, so I am left with the choice of spending more for a crippled product, or waiting until you find the resources and motivation to speed along the development cycle. I would be paying for the full utility of X4 with the cost of the upgrade, and I would be denied a significant piece of that utility. There are better word processors for my purposes than Word… I resent that you turn to the needs of users like myself last. It’s a question of quality and product design. The “new” version apparently will not be released until well into 2011, and then I will still avoid it (though I am likely to upgrade, as the utility for legacy documents justifies the small investment). I already own MS Office for Mac in its current version. There is nothing standard about Microsoft Word except for its ubiquity. ![]() Surely you can make faster progress than you have demonstrated to allow users like me (who are numerous, especially in certain disciplines) use your product most productively with alternative workflow strategies than the so-called de facto “standard” I stopped using Word years ago and I find it a major defect in any product that its use, as a general or generic capability for a task set, is restricted to specific proprietary products from third parties (in this case, two of the largest vendors in this market: Microsoft and Apple). One impediment for me in doing so is the dilatory effort at creating this plug-in or driver for OpenOffice, or any other word processor (other than Apple’s product) than Microsoft Word. I just received your email for upgrading to X4 (from X3 in my case). I’ve been a licensed user of EndNote since v.2 ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |